Sunday | October 1, 2000
Home Page
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Arts &Leisure
Outlook

E-Financial Gleaner

Subscribe
Classifieds
Guest Book
Submit Letter
The Gleaner Co.
Advertising
Search

Go-Shopping
Question
Business Directory
Free Mail
Overseas Gleaner & Star
Kingston Live - Via Go-Jamaica's Web Cam atop the Gleaner Building, Down Town, Kingston
Discover Jamaica
Go-Chat
Go-Jamaica Screen Savers
Inns of Jamaica
Personals
Find a Jamaican
5-day Weather Forecast
Book A Vacation
Search the Web!

Ungrateful set

THE EDITOR, Madam:

AS PUBLISHED in this newspaper recently, a Barbadian said - "We have to remove the shackles of British Law". My dictionary tells me the word "shackle" means "to hamper". Now, if British laws were hampering, how could Barbadians have shared in freedom using that law throughout several ages? By trying to remove Brit Law, I suppose the day may soon come when some people will also try to remove the English language.

The British law opened the eyes of people in various parts of the world. The British are intellectuals, instructors, disciplinarians. They serve a very useful purpose. To style British law "shackle" is insulting to the Commonwealth.

Madam Editor, you have some people (in this world) you give them a spicy, superb dinner on a plate, instead of saying "thanks" they bore a hole in the plate.

Now, may I ask a pertinent question. By having the Queen as head of state, does that lessen the dignity of the Barbadians?

I am, etc.,

VERNAL BANKERSINGH

Constant Spring

Back to Letters


©Copyright 2000 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions