Saturday | March 10, 2001
Home Page
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Farmer's Weekly
Religion
Real Estate

E-Financial Gleaner

Subscribe
Classifieds
Guest Book
Submit Letter
The Gleaner Co.
Advertising
Search

Go-Shopping
Question
Business Directory
Free Mail
Overseas Gleaner & Star
Kingston Live - Via Go-Jamaica's Web Cam atop the Gleaner Building, Down Town, Kingston
Discover Jamaica
Go-Chat
Go-Jamaica Screen Savers
Inns of Jamaica
Personals
Find a Jamaican
5-day Weather Forecast
Book A Vacation
Search the Web!

Police officers concerned about death benefits delay

THE EXECUTIVE of the Police Officers Association (POA) yesterday expressed concern over the delay in paying out death benefits to relatives of policemen killed in the line of duty.

"We are concerned about the well-being of the men and women we command," said Senior Superintendent Novlette Grant. "Why should there be any delay for the payment of death benefits to the families of Constable Christopher Dunkley and others who were killed while on duty?"

Constable Dunkley was killed by gunmen while on duty in the guardroom of the Bridgeport Police Station, South St. Catherine, in April, 1998.

The POA is also concerned over the non-delivery of over 5,000 ballistics vests and helmets which they have asked the Ministry of National Security for.

"Up to now we have not heard anything from the Government in respect to the protective gears. We were scheduled to meet with the National Security Minister, K.D. Knight, on March 6, but because of a funeral the meeting was postponed," Inspector Merrick Watson, Chairman of the Police Federation, told The Gleaner.

As it relates to the death benefits, Inspector Watson explained that 11 files have been submitted to the Attorney-General's office, which will determine if the policemen had died in the line of duty.

According to the executive of the POA, a policeman is never off duty, because if he were to witness a crime being committed, despite having left his place of work at the end of his shift, then it is likely that he could be charged if the matter was brought to the attention of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

Back to News








©Copyright 2000 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions