Thursday | January 17, 2002
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Cornwall Edition
What's Cooking
Science & Technology
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Weather
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Subscription
Interactive
Chat
Free Email
Guestbook
Personals
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

Gay rights and hypocrisy

THE EDITOR, Sir:

CONTRARY TO what most people in Jamaica believe, the issue of gay rights is not about what is right and what is wrong; it is basically about the fundamental human right of consenting adults to engage in homosexual acts in privacy.

In a letter entitled, "Gays and the Bible" published in your edition of Thursday, December 20, Pastor Stevenson Samuels wrongly claims that "It must be the responsibility of the community to establish what is right and what is wrong"; which interestingly conflicts with the traditional Christian perspective that it is the Word of God as reflected in the Bible which determines what is right and what is wrong.

Christians who are vigorously opposed to homosexuality, often use the Bible rather selectively to condemn homosexuality, citing Leviticus 20:10 which also strongly condemns adulterers to death. However, despite the equally strong condemnation of adultery, the state rightly does not criminalise adultery as neither Christians nor the state regard adultery as a criminal act. It can only be sheer hypocrisy to endorse the criminalising of homosexual acts on the basis of the Biblical injunction, while ignoring the equally strong injunction condemning adultery!

I am firmly of the view that morality should not be legislated as it is not the business of the State or community to determine what is right and what is wrong. It is the business of the State to govern and in particular, to ensure law and order, and should intervene only when the good order of the State or community is violated.

Consenting adults indulging in homosexual acts in the privacy of their bedrooms does not in any way violate the good order of the State. Therefore, there is absolutely no justification for criminalising homosexual acts between consenting adults! It is on such grounds that I fully support and endorse JFLAG in its bid to decriminalise such acts.

I am etc.,

GEORGE McGRATH

Kingston

Back to Letters













In Association with AandE.com

©Copyright 2000-2001 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions