Tuesday | August 20, 2002
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
The Shipping Industry
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Communities
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Weather
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Subscription
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

Windalco salary talks resume after Morrison's retraction


Economist Dennis Morrison, whose comments angered the National Workers Union. - File

WAGE TALKS between Windalco (formerly Alcan Jamaica) and the National Workers Union (NWU) will resume this morning at the Ministry of Labour in Kingston.

The Ministry's industrial relations director, Gresford Smith, confirmed yesterday that both the management and the union had confirmed that they would be attending today's meeting.

The talks, which should have continued last Tuesday, were put off after the union refused to meet until a statement attributed to senior director of the Jamaica Bauxite Institute (JBI), Dennis Morrison, concerning the Personal Income Protection (PIP) agreement between the companies and the workers, which tags their pay to fluctuations in US dollar exchange rate, was retracted.

In a statement on the weekend, Mr. Morrison retracted earlier comments he had made on the PIP on radio. Mr. Morrison said that at a meeting on the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the unions and the company last week Wednesday, chaired by the Minister of Mining and Energy, Anthony Hylton, he had agreed to retract the comments made on radio.

"The National Workers Union described my comments as inappropriate, as the NWU was having wage talks with Windalco on those same issues. I offered to retract the comments I made on radio. I regretted that anyone could have construed my remarks as an attack against bauxite workers," he said.

"I said that no such bias was intended nor was I trying to interfere with the collective bargaining process. It was the unions who had requested that I be interviewed on the matter and I was only trying to explain an economic principle, a devaluation process and its effects on the economy in my private capacity," he said.

Back to Business





















In Association with AandE.com

©Copyright 2000-2001 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions