Monday | August 26, 2002
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Flair
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Communities
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Weather
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Subscription
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

Setting the date

ALL APPEARS to be in place for an Election Day that should be free of many of the elements that have marred past elections. The arrangements have been put in place against the background of uncertainty about the date of the election.

We repeat the point we have made previously that it is time to review the practice by which the Prime Minister has sole authority to set the election date.

We think that in carrying out a process of constitutional reform, setting a fixed date for General Elections should be high on the agenda.

It is at the very least an anachronism for one person to have the power to decide when a General Election will be held. For example, it is not far-fetched that the Prime Minister could decide that despite the heightened state of readiness he will postpone the elections until next year.

Placing that much power in one pair of hands is unacceptable.

The suspense and uncertainty about when the national elections are held can affect orderly planning in both public and private sector. And it can unduly prolong the period of campaigning which absorbs resources and energy which might be applied more profitably elsewhere.

Back to Commentary


















In Association with AandE.com

©Copyright 2000-2001 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions