Bookmark jamaica-gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Cornwall Edition
What's Cooking
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Communities
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Weather
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Subscription
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

Globalisation and Ja's woes
published: Thursday | January 23, 2003

THE EDITOR, Sir:

I AM writing in response to a letter published in this paper on the 17th of January 17, 2003, entitled 'Why the Highway 2000 protest'. One of the points Mr. Harrison makes is .. "The Jamaican worker needs to know that in today's world of globalisation he can be displaced by more efficient workers even in his own country".

Why is this so? No contractor in South Korea, France, Belgium or the United States could bring in truck drivers and claim globalisation. The country would come to a standstill. It is important that we understand the implications that globalisation is having and will continue to have on our economies but we should not blindly jump on the bandwagon and sacrifice our jobs to the god of free trade.

I, too, would appreciate a good journalist investigating why there was industrial action. If the drivers were unreasonable in their actions we should explain why they are unreasonable, come to an acceptable arrangement and get on with the job. We should not be quick to give away their jobs to foreigners. On the broader issue of globalisation, I propose that we adopt the policies of the people who benefit the most out of it, the Americans and Europeans. These countries will support free trade in anything that they hold a decisive competitive advantage in. And in order to gain this competitive advantage they are not above going against free trade principles.

Therefore, the average subsidy received by a soybean farmer in the United States is US$37,000 ($1.6 million) per year. Can you then look at a Jamaican farmer and say that he needs to be more efficient and compete with this. Get real. Reference the Americans' reaction when China heeded their advice and became more efficient at producing steel. They imposed tariffs.

I am not advocating that Jamaica begins imposing tariffs as we do not have the political muscle; we cannot afford it and it generally doesn't get to the intended recipients. What I am saying is that we do not be so quick to snuff out the livelihood of Jamaican workers in the name of globalisation.

I am, etc.,

DAVID PEARCE

dpearce@strath.ac.uk

Glasgow, Scotland

Via Go-Jamaica

More Letters
















In Association with AandE.com

©Copyright 2000-2001 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions

Home - Jamaica Gleaner