Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Arts &Leisure
Outlook
In Focus
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Communities
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Weather
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Subscription
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

Editorial - Legitimising a Caribbean court
published: Sunday | May 4, 2003

DEBATE ABOUT the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) involves two separate issues. One is that the present system of appeal to the United Kingdom Privy Council may ensure a higher level of impartial justice than would a Caribbean court with judges subject to political pressure.

The other issue is that, regardless of where better justice is likely to be found and granting that Caribbean judges are as skilled and will be as impartial as their English counterparts, such grave constitutional principles are involved that they should be put before the Jamaican people in a referendum.

The fundamental rights of people are enshrined in the constitution of the country of which they are citizens. Our constitution established the right of appeal to the UK Privy Council but constitutional rights are not static, they can be changed.

The question is, should such a major change be decided in Parliament by a simple majority vote? Even if technically permissible, taking advantage of a constitutional loophole for political expediency raises moral and ethical concerns. Is use of raw political parliamentary power preferable to consulting the wishes of the people by way of a referendum?

Talk of consultation short of a referendum must be seen for what it is ­ pure sham. Consultation must be a two-way process and until the people vote on clearly defined alternatives the Government has no way of knowing how they truly feel and is guilty of a sin of presumption.

Government has been less than forthright in stating clearly and honestly why it is against a referendum. This in itself is cause for concern because it reinforces a sorry Jamaican political tradition of not trusting the judgment of the people, of feeling that by clever manipulation anything can be forced down their throats. We had hoped that these attitudes were relics of the past.

If the Caribbean Court of Justice is to be established, as we hope it eventually will be, it must receive the blessing of consensus and that legitimacy which in a democracy can only come from reflecting the will of the people.

We support the call of the Jamaica Bar Association, Jamaicans for Justice and the Farquharson Institute of Public Affairs for a referendum.

More Commentary


















©Copyright2003 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions

Home - Jamaica Gleaner