Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Arts &Leisure
In Focus
Social
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Communities
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Library
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

Group seeks withdrawal of proposed Terrorism Bill - Lawyers preparing submission to Government
published: Sunday | December 21, 2003

By Damion Mitchell, Staff Reporter


Aub

LAWYERS ACTING on behalf of Campaign for Global Justice (Jamaica) are preparing a submission to Government requesting that it withdraws the proposed Terrorism Prevention Bill, Beth Aub, a member of the organisation told a forum at the University of the West Indies at Mona in St. Andrew yesterday.

According to Campaign for Global Justice, the Terrorism Prevention Act would result in the rights of innocent Jamaicans being severely infringed. "The Terrorism Prevention Bill if passed into law will make every single act of civil disobedience a terrorist act," said Mrs. Aub, adding that the Bill also provided for an individual to be deemed a terrorist if he/she ­ whether knowing or unknowingly ­ associates with a perceived terrorist.

Section (3) of the Bill defines a terrorist act as "serious interference with or serious disruption of an essential service facility or system whether public or private."

Mrs. Aub also said that the Bill made provision for persons to be arrested on the suspicion that there was an intention to commit any perceived terrorist action, "But how can you convict someone on intent?" she questioned.

To further compound the situation, she said that evidence brought against a person accused of terrorism, would not be disclosed neither to the accused nor his lawyer because of reasons associated with "state security".

COMPLIANCE WITH US

And noting that support for the Terrorism Bill would mean compliance with demands from the United States of America, Mrs. Aub said that under the act, mandatory sentencing for those found guilty would be death. However, the Privy Council does not support capital punishment.

Yvonne Sobers, head of the Families Against State Terrorism (FAST) said that the bill which represents a Commonwealth model, drafted by a committee including representatives from Britain, Australia and Canada, was an attempt to "pull the plug" on democracy.

"It is particularly sad that we are going into this thing when a number of countries are going against it," she said.

For his part Lloyd D'Aguilar a member of the Campaign for Global Justice, said that the Terrorism Prevention Bill was designed to give more "power" to the Government and that such an Act was unnecessary as present criminal and civil laws address all offences and the respective penalties.

The Terrorism Bill was tabled in Parliament recently. Members of the public have until December 31 to make submissions to facilitate its passing by March of next year.

More News | | Print this Page

















©Copyright2003 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions

Home - Jamaica Gleaner