Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Communities
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Library
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

'None of the above'
published: Wednesday | December 24, 2003

THE EDITOR, Sir:

THE RUSSIANS seem to have got it right. On the ballots in their recent parliamentary elections they had an option meaning 'none of the above'. I think it is a marvellous option that should always be presented to voters. I am sure we would have higher turnouts as many potential voters embrace this alternative in preference to staying away from the polls, the only currently available expression of disenchantment with the political parties.

This is in light of the fact that the category "did not vote" is a broad one, accommodating of several interpretations. Political parties might draw incorrect interpretations from such pliable data, or put unwarranted constructions on it to serve their own purposes.

A box on the ballot paper designated "none of the above" would provide a much more meaningful idea of how citizens feel about what the parties are offering. We would no longer have to draw conclusions from silence, but would be in a position to see whether the 40 per cent forgot to vote or didn't see anything to vote for.

We might even have enough time to explore this option prior to the next elections.

I am, etc.,

MICHAEL NICHOLSON

Liguanea Avenue

Kingston 6

More Letters | | Print this Page















©Copyright2003 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions

Home - Jamaica Gleaner