Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Communities
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Library
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!

Negotiating the IMF quagmire
published: Friday | January 23, 2004


THE current economic situation that requires frequent injections of foreign credit or local credit is a constant reminder that unless we are clear on our future goals, we will always be running in the same spot just to avoid falling behind. This is because when the current administration made that decisive decision to break with the IMF and go it alone, it could have imagined that its economic tenure would still be tied up with IMF approval in some form or the other.

Why I say this is that it is obvious that without some amount of IMF approval, the Finance Minister, Dr. Omar Davies, is going to find it difficult to continue accessing private capital in foreign markets at favourable interest rates we can afford. It may not be the IMF Stand-by type agreement or Extended Fund facility, that we have used in the past, but it is obvious that creditors who matter (that is, largely those in Western capitalist countries) pay close attention to the IMF report on a country. This is despite the major mistakes that were made by the IMF in the past with policy choices prescribed for some developing countries and, I daresay, with Jamaica.

We have found ourselves in an IMF quagmire (bog) where we are better off getting national consensus on our future priorities, rather than take the IMF path and have the government find a consensus with the IMF that meets international approval but significant criticism at home, making such agreements unworkable. If you believe that I am mistaken then look at the experiences of the Dominican Republic, Argentina and Ecuador, who all signed agreements with the IMF but were forced to backtrack in the face of violent and deadly street protests.

It is sad when a government cannot take tough economic decisions that will safeguard the future of the country, but even sadder when it throws up its hands and then negotiates an IMF agreement, knowing that it is merely living on borrowed time (if it operates in a situation where democratic elections will spell its end).

I don't know if we are at that point of finding ourselves in that IMF quagmire, but it is urgent that priority targets be spelt out and the populace be educated around the desirability of reaching these targets, or we soon won't be able to make those choices for ourselves.

More Business | | Print this Page



















©Copyright2003 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions

Home - Jamaica Gleaner