Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Cornwall Edition
What's Cooking
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Communities
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Library
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!
Other News
Stabroek News
The Voice

Customs officers appeal court decision
published: Thursday | July 15, 2004

By Barbara Gayle, Staff Reporter

THE EIGHT customs officers, who were ordered reinstated by the Public Service Commission in 1999 after they were sent on interdiction in 1997, are appealing against a Supreme Court ruling that they were not entitled to vacation leave while they were on interdiction.

The customs officers, who were interdicted arising from a multi-million dollar car importation racket in 1993, had brought an action in the Supreme Court last year contending that they had more than 105 days vacation leave which had acumulated while they were on interdiction. They claimed they should be paid for their vacation leave.

LOST OPPORTUNITES

The officers said they were not seeking to go on vacation leave because while on interdiction they had been passed over for promotions. They also lost opportunites for training for advancement in their field.

Mr. Justice Marjorie Cole-Smith heard the case in the Supreme Court and the customs officers are contending that the judge failed to appreciate and make a clear distinction between a period of interdiction and vacation leave. The appellants said the judge held that both could be equated as they involved the employee being absent from work with his employers's consent.

More News | | Print this Page















©Copyright2003 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions

Home - Jamaica Gleaner