Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Profiles in Medicine
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Communities
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Library
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!
Other News
Stabroek News
The Voice

Mandatory death penalty for review
published: Wednesday | October 6, 2004

Robert Hart, Parliamentary Reporter

LEGISLATION SEEKING to strip the mandatory death sentence from Jamaica's law books was yesterday tabled in the House of Representatives.

The move was in response to the Privy Council's ruling earlier this year that the country's automatic death penalty is unconstitutional.

The new legislation will require a review of the cases of all prisoners who received the mandatory death penalty as well as the court's determination of the appropriate sentences.

Dr. Peter Phillips, Minister of National Security, took charge of the Offences Against the Person (Amendment) Act, 2004, and could open the debate in the House next week.

INHUMAN PUNISHMENT

According to Senator A.J. Nicholson, the Minister of Justice, a decision was taken to amend the Act after the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council ruled on July 7, 2004, that the mandatory death sentence under Section 3 (1A) is "an inhuman punishment" and therefore unconstitutional.

The amendment bill seeks to remove the mandatory sentence of death for murder and give the court the discretion to impose a sentence of death or imprisonment for life in those cases that formerly attracted the death sentence.

In stating its objects and reasons, the Justice Minister also said the Bill seeks to "impose upon the court a duty to specify a period of imprisonment for which the offender should serve before becoming eligible for parole".

The Bill proposes that the court be required to hear submissions, representations and evidence relevant to the issue of the sentence to be passed.

More Lead Stories | | Print this Page









































© Copyright 1997-2004 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions
Home - Jamaica Gleaner