Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Social
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
Communities
Search This Site
powered by FreeFind
Services
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Library
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Search the Web!
Other News
Stabroek News
The Voice

The art of insult
published: Friday | November 19, 2004


Ian McDonald

WE NEED new and more imaginative swear words. We need to lift the level of vituperation. The cursing you hear, internationally as well as locally, is of a very low standard and boringly repetitive. The nouns are varied ­ scandal, shame, misery, nonsense, disgrace, confusion, shambles, chaos, mess ­ but the adjectives attached to the nouns never vary very much. Indeed, 90 per cent of the time a single, ancient, Anglo-Saxon expletive, which I see has been allowed to appear in the latest edition of Webster's dictionary, serves to define whatever sort of mess, scandal, or disgrace is being described.

This is not good enough. Surely we can invent subtler and more descriptive language to lambast those in authority. The truth is, this is an age of mindless profanity, not thoughtful invective. There are very few still around who take the time and trouble to craft literate, elegant insults ­ like Winston Churchill in the House of Commons calling Clement Attlee, the Labour Prime Minister, "a sheep in sheep's clothing." Or the Australian Paul Keating sneering at a long-time political opponent: "This little flower, this delicate little beauty, this cream puff. this shiver looking for a spine to run up."

CONCEITED IDIOT

I like the story of the great mediaeval Italian poet, Dante. He was having a bad time at the court of his patron, Can Grande Della Scala. A conceited idiot at the court was being treated much better than Dante and one day this man asked the poet: "How is it that I, who am so ignorant, should be so rich and favoured while you, who are so learned and wise, should be a beggar?" Quick as a flash Dante gave the fool the perfect reply.

"The reason is that you have found a lord that resembles you and when I find one who resembles me I shall no doubt be as rich as you." And hear this magnificent insult come down to us through the mists of time ­ it is the marvellous taunt delivered thousands of years ago by Thersites against King Agamemnon: "An honest fellow enough, and one that loves quails, but he has not so much brain as ear-wax!"

However, I have to say that for sheer contempt expressed as insult I have seldom read anything as biting as the account given by Senator Robert Byrd in his book Losing America of a meeting the old Senator attended with the current President of the United States.

The event was a gathering of congressional leaders summoned to hear about legislation the president wanted passed establishing the Department of Homeland Security. Bush offered "desultory" remarks about creating a new department and while cameras and lights dominated the scene, thanked Congress for its advice and cooperation. The lights went off, reporters and cameramen departed, and Bush announced he must leave to make a speech in St. Louis.

SECURITY PACKAGE

Senator Byrd asked to be heard: "I noted that the president wanted quick action on his 'homeland security package' but [said] I had never been informed of what was in the "package". I had heard one leader at the table vow passage of 'this thing' by Election Day. I repeated that as yet, I don't know what 'this thing' is.

"The president responded with a non sequitur, thanking me for my statement and assuring me that it would be considered. Then he promptly rose and headed out the door. Amazing. I might as well have been reciting a recipe for Christmas fruitcake. My opinion of meetings at the White House hit a new low. I was struck by the president's dismal performance. To say it was mediocre would be a gross exaggeration. He was disorganized, unprepared, and rambling. This fellow was all hat and no cattle, as they would say in Texas. It was obvious that he had no idea what was in his Department of Homeland Security proposal, nor did he seem to care."

Byrd had sat in meetings with presidents since Harry Truman, and now he wrote, "But this president, this Bush number 43, was in a class by himself ­ ineptitude supreme. This meeting with Bush the Younger topped anything I had seen, from Truman on, for absolute tripe!"

Ian McDonald is an occasional contributor who lives and works in Georgetown, Guyana.

More Commentary | | Print this Page















© Copyright 1997-2004 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions
Home - Jamaica Gleaner