Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Flair
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Services
Archives
Find a Jamaican
Library
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Other News
Stabroek News

Halo effect around the EU
published: Monday | December 27, 2004

Gwynne Dyer, Contributor

THERE IS a kind of halo effect around the European Union. Even though the EU doesn't actively push its values on its neighbours, the mere fact that a majority of Europeans already live in this zone where democracy works and civil and human rights are genuinely respected is transforming expectations and behaviour in the rest of Europe.

Take Turkey, for example. The 70 million Turks have practically turned themselves inside out in their effort to meet the standards on democracy, human rights, and legal and fiscal propriety demanded of countries seeking to open membership negotiations. Turkey has changed more in the past three years than in the previous thirty, and almost entirely for the better.

NON-VIOLENT MASS PROTESTS

Or consider the re-staged second round of the Ukrainian presidential election. The weeks of non-violent mass protests in Kiev that forced the cancellation of the rigged election results and a re-run under intense international scrutiny would probably not have happened without the hope of eventual EU membership for Ukraine.

A majority of Ukrainians, who have lived for the past 13 years in a post-Soviet morass of arrogant corruption, brazen election-rigging and sold-out media, took to the streets because they believed that there could be an alternative future for their country in the EU. Ukrainian entry into the EU may be even further away than Turkey's, but it was that vision of honest government, free media and fair enforcement of the law glimmering on the horizon that made the Orange Revolution in Ukraine possible.

DEMANDING RIGHTS

The same was at least partly true for the Rose Revolution in Georgia last year, and it was wholly true for the other 'Orange Revolution' of the past month - the one that happened in Romania. In every case, the initiative came from local people demanding the same rights and values that EU citizens enjoy, not from the EU trying to export its values to the east. In fact, if it had been left to the governments that are allegedly the guardians of the EU's democratic values, it wouldn't have happened at all.

Romania had the most oppressive Communist party in eastern Europe before 1989, and the revolution there in December of that year was largely a fake. Leading regime members, seeing which way the wind was blowing, launched a coup, stood dictator Nicolae Ceausescu and his wife against a wall, and shot them. But then they just renamed themselves Social Democrats and went right on ruling the place. They have been in power for most of the past 15 years, enriching themselves shamelessly and manipulating the media and the electoral system to stay in charge. Corruption is so bad that an estimated ten per cent of the average Romanian's income goes to bribing public officials. Romania was much less qualified for EU membership than Turkey - it even has a lower per capita income - and yet the EU was pushiing entry negotiations through to an early conclusion.

NO POPULAR ANXIETY

The 22 million Romanians are not Muslims, so there was no popular anxiety in existing EU members about letting them in. EU officials were deeply cynical about the possibility of real reform in Romania, and decided to let it in anyway. Prime Minister Adrian Nastase, once a fervent supporter of Ceausescu, seemed to be cruising smoothly to another term after the first round of elections in early December, although monitors from the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe reported multiple voting frauds. (The EU did not bother to send monitors.)

DEMOCRACY WRITTEN OFF

In effect, practically everybody had written off democracy in Romania ­ except the Romanians. In the second round of voting on December 12, with much closer monitoring of the polls, they voted Nastase out and elected Traian Basescu, a former ship's captain with no links to the ex-Communist oligarchy. It will take Basescu years to loosen the grip of the oligarchs on Romania's economy and its media but the Romanians have decided that if they are going to be in the EU, they want the whole package. Given the choice, people know what they want.

Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries.

More Commentary | | Print this Page















© Copyright 1997-2004 Gleaner Company Ltd. | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions
Home - Jamaica Gleaner