Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Farmer's Weekly
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Questions for dancehall sponsors
published: Saturday | July 23, 2005

THE EDITOR, Sir:

IN RESPONSE to Ian Boyne's article dated July 17, 2005, "Forget It! Red Stripe says no to Beenie and Bounty", I myself have appreciated what Red Stripe has done, but there are a few questions that bother me. Cable & Wireless has backed down, Red Stripe stands, nobody knows why are they still standing. Is there something the public should know?

Jamaican dancehall artistes are not just now spewing violent lyrics, this has been happening for years. Citizens like myself have been pleading a long time for sponsors to put an end to supporting and sponsoring these dancehall artistes, for TV stations to stop showing these videos and for radio stations to stop playing them but it all fell on deaf ears, because we are just ordinary citizens, why should our voices be heard? From time to time you'll see letters to the Editor concerning these lyrics and nothing done.

Any well-thinking Jamaican would agree with me that these lyrics have contributed to violent and criminal activities, note I say "have contributed" but sponsors like Red Stripe and Cable & Wireless still supported them because they brought bucks to their kitty.

VIOLENT LYRICS

Now that the gays have stood up re: violence against them, their voices have been heard. Red Stripe has decided to show some guts and stamina against violent lyrics. Why has it taken the gays for Red Stripe to see what violent lyrics can do and what it has been doing? Or this is done only in the gays' interest but not for the Jamaican public?

The article said that "Red Stripe makes it plain that it's not just concerned about the right to life of homosexuals, but of ghetto people and the poor uneducated youth are likely victims of violence in Jamaica."

When has the life of ghetto people and the poor uneducated youth and other persons who may become victims of violence in Jamaica become a company's concern? Or is it just a sham? And if it is not a sham why didn't anyone give a listening ear and show some concern before the gays spoke?

Thanks, Red Stripe, for sticking out, but why are you doing it just now?

I am, etc.,

V. HENRY

Havendale

Kingston 19

More Letters



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories

















© Copyright 1997-2005 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner