Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Lifestyle
International
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

KRAAL TRIAL: DAY 11 - Judge reprimands defence lawyer over use of cop's alias
published: Tuesday | November 15, 2005

Barbara Gayle, Staff Reporter

CHIEF JUSTICE Lensley Wolfe yesterday chided defence lawyer Valerie Neita-Robertson for calling a policeman by his alias 'Dutty Dog Brown'.

Mrs. Neita-Robertson was putting suggestions to police constable Tyrone Brown when she said: "I suggest you are not a truthful person, Mr. Dutty Dog Brown."

"Do not do that and you should apologise," the Chief Justice remarked. Mrs. Neita-Robertson pointed out that she had the right to call Brown by his alias because the witness had admitted to her in court that it was his alias.

The Chief Justice said the manner in which it was done was to embarrass the witness.

IMPOSE SANCTIONS

"And if you do it again, I am going to impose sanctions," the Chief Justice warned.

"So be it my lord, but I am entitled to do so," was Mrs. Neita-Robertson's quick response.

Commenting further, the Chief Justice said: "That type of conduct brings the Bar into disrepute."

When Constable Brown, who came into court under tight security, was asked under cross-examination if he was now living in a foreign country, he hesitated.

Prosecutor Terrence Williams said there was an arrangement for him under the Witness Protection Programme and added that the question was irrelevant.

The Chief Justice ruled it was not and when the witness was asked if he was living outside the shores of Jamaica, he said yes. He said he was not employed abroad but he got a subsistence.

Mrs. Neita-Robertson, who was cross-examining him, suggested to him that there had been offers to live abroad and he had taken up an offer and that was the reason he was lying to the court in relation to his evidence.

The witness denied the suggestion.

INCONSISTENCIES

The witness, on being shown his statement of July 1, admitted that it was inconsistent with his testimony in the Home Circuit Court yesterday regarding where SSP Adams was when the firearm in the bag was handed over to him.

It was at that stage that Mrs. Neita-Robertson referred to Brown's alias and said he was not speaking the truth.

More Lead Stories



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories








































© Copyright 1997-2005 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner