Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Flair
Caribbean
International
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

LETTER OF THE DAY - Siting of cemetery seen as health risk
published: Monday | December 5, 2005

THE EDITOR, Sir:

WE HAVE written the following as an open letter to the Ministry of Health, NEPA, ODPEM and the Ministry of Land and Environment:

It has come to the attention of the Association of General Practitioners of Jamaica of a potential health risk posed by the location of a proposed cemetery in the Ramble/Hampton Grove section of Hanover. Questions are being asked about the risk of contamination of the water table that is located directly below that site.

The proposed cemetery site is, we understand, about 200 metres above sea level and is considerably higher than many of the springs that are currently being used to bottle spring water.

The location by nature is limestone, which is extremely porous and makes easy passage of contaminants to the water table.

We believe that prevention is better than cure and strongly encourage that the following questions be answered before any further development takes place:

a) Is the water table in that area a contributor to the Great River and hence the Great River water supply?

b) Can a sealed vault absolutely prevent contamination from vault contents, that is, embalming chemicals and products of decomposition?

c) Are there active springs in the area which are now being used by residents for domestic, commercial and recreational activities?

d) Which agencies have approved this particular development?

e) Were any environmental impact assessments carried out?

As health practitioners who strongly believe in prevention, we urge the relevant authorities to re-evaluate and reconsider the wisdom of the decisions that were made.

This letter is also being forwarded to ODPEM in light of the possible impending disaster.

I am, etc.,

DR. LYNVAL BLOODFIELD

for the Executive Board Association of General Practitioners of Jamaica

More Letters



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories

















© Copyright 1997-2005 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner