More justice for democracy
published: Saturday | January 7, 2006

The Editor, Sir:

The sacrifice of principle on the altar of experience can result in disastrous consequences.

In the early 20th century, there was a young democracy whose political and social systems were in disarray. A coup d'etat by force of arms was attempted. The effort failed and the chief perpetrator was put on trial. At his trial for treason he made a political speech which so impressed the three-man panel of judges that he received a five-year sentence of imprisonment, but served only nine months. He was treated as an honoured guest at Landsberg prison and allowed a personal secretary. He used the nine months to dictate his political testament 'Mein Kampf.' That man, Adolph Hitler, was to prove to be a disaster for Germany and the world.

This story may have little relevance to Jamaica or its system of justice, however, it should serve as a warning to Mark Wignall and those like him who endorse the view that considerations having nothing to do with the evidence can or ought to be a basis for the decision of a jury.

It is my view that if we are to preserve our democracy and the rule of law, more justice, not less, is required.

I am, etc.,

DAVID G. BATTS

Attorney-at-law

72 Harbour Street

Kingston