Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Farmer's Weekly
What's Cooking
Caribbean
International
Eye on Science
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Public servants earn leave while on interdiction
published: Thursday | March 23, 2006

Barbara Gayle, Staff Reporter

THE COURT of Appeal ruled yesterday that public servants were entitled to earn and accumulate vacation leave during the period they were on interdiction.

The ruling was made in favour of six customs officers who were reinstated in November 1999 after being on interdiction for six years.

When they applied for their vacation leave the Attorney-General sought a declaration from the Supreme Court as to "whether public officers are entitled to earn and accumulate vacation leave and to be paid salary in lieu of vacation leave in relation to periods during which they are on interdiction."

Government lawyers had argued in the Supreme Court that the right to accumulate leave was not one of the entitlements, outlined in the Public Service Regulations, for an officer who was reinstated after interdiction.

On July 18, 2003, Justice Marjorie Cole-Smith ruled in favour of the Government.

Customs officers Beatrice McKenzie, Pamela Wright, Betsy Jones, Desmond Carty, Carlton Campbell and Orrett Harrison took the issue to the Court of Appeal.

APPEAL

Attorneys-at-law Crafton Miller and Stephany Orr, who represented the customs officers, argued that the judge erred in finding that a period of interdiction and vacation leave were equitable.

The Court of Appeal comprising Justice Seymour Panton, Justice Karl Harrison and Justice Hazel Harris heard the appeal and ruled in favour of the customs officers. The court said that a public officer may elect when he proceeded on vacation leave, while an officer who was on interdiction did not have the option to choose whether he remained on duty.

The customs officers were sent on interdiction in 1993 with quarter pay for alleged breaches of the Customs Act. It was alleged that they were knowingly concerned in the fraudulent evasion of import duties on motor vehicles. However, in May 1997, the prosecution withdrew the charges. Disciplinary proceedings were instituted against them in October 1997 but the charges were not established and they were reinstated on November 9, 1999.

More News



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2006 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner