Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Profiles in Medicine
International
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Man freed of conspiracy charge after five years
published: Wednesday | April 12, 2006

Barbara Gayle, Staff Reporter

THE COURT of Appeal has expressed disgust that a man had to wait for five years to have his name cleared because officers in a Resident Magistrate's Court were tardy in handling transcript of his trial.

Michael Hylton, former director of the Sugar Industry Research Institute (SIRI), gave notice of appeal in October 1999 after he was convicted of conspiracy to defraud. The transcript of the proceedings in the Corporate Area Resident Magistrate's Court did not reach the Court of Appeal until September last year.

UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT

In quashing Hylton's conviction and setting aside the sentence, the court said "in this particular case, the conduct of the relevant officers is wholly unacceptable and ought not to be repeated". Mr. Justice Seymour Panton, Mr. Justice Karl Harrison and Mrs. Justice Zaila McCalla said in their unanimous decision that the court was at a loss as to why the case had taken such a long time to come before the court.

The judges disclosed that from time to time the court experienced similar delays in cases being sent from the Resident Magistrate's Court.

Hylton and businessman Roy Paharsingh of Paharsingh Engineering Works were charged jointly with two counts of conspiracy to defraud the Sugar Industry Authority (SIA) of money.

CONVICTION

They were convicted of falsely pretending between 1994 to 1995 that Paharsingh had paid customs duties on imported goods. They were convicted of conspiring together to defraud by causing the SIA to pay grossly exaggerated prices to Paharsingh for imported goods.

They were given suspended sentences after they were convicted in 1999. Paharsingh was convicted of a total of four charges. The Court of Appeal quashed three of Paharsingh's convictions. The court affirmed Paharsingh's conviction and suspended sentence in respect of the count charging him with intent to defraud the Sugar Industry Authority of $203,000 in January 1995. Paharsingh had falsely pretended that the money was payable to him in respect of customs duties for goods he had imported on behalf of the Sugar Industry Research Institute.

More News



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2006 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner