Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Let's Talk Life
Caribbean
International
Volunteer Today
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

ISSUE: The Cricket World Cup debate
published: Saturday | April 22, 2006

  • PR BENEFITS

    The hosting of the 2007 World Cup Cricket will be good for Jamaica from a public relations standpoint. However, the island cannot afford such a costly undertaking at a time when 70 cents of every dollar of government revenue goes into servicing the national debt.

    Nurses, policemen and teachers clamour each year for wage increases and are repeatedly told by Government that they are not in a position to meet their demands. What led to the decision for Jamaica to host the World Cup Cricket? Why was the country kept in the dark for so long about the minuscule earnings from Cricket World Cup, against the cost of staging the event?

    The former administration, under P.J. Patterson's leadership, took the bandwagon approach on certain regional issues. The CCJ, the CSME and Cricket World Cup 2007 are three examples of government opting for the best interest of the region, as opposed to what was in the best interest of Jamaica.

    The preparation for Cricket World Cup 2007 is looking more and more like an exercise in financial recklessness. What was the process used in the contract bidding for the rebuilding of Sabina Park and the construction of the Trelawny stadium? The short-term gains from hosting Cricket World Cup are not worth the long-term problems that the country will face well into the future.

    Patrick A. Gallimore, pagalley@hotmail.com, Kingston, Via Go-Jamaica

  • SAVING THE CUP

    Jamaica at a (World Cup) loss? I note the articles that refer to the spectre of financial loss in hosting the World Cup Cricket. If Jamaica stands to lose some US$191 million by so doing, if it is too late to pull out, and if we are willing to save ourselves, why do we not put our heads together to see how we can supplement the meagre income expectations? Is this too much to ask?

    Let's brainstorm the problem. Yes, be irritated, but table new ideas, investigate them, incubate the results, be inspired, innovate, invest and improve the income outcome. Or does this all rest with the Government? Every profession, industry, artform, service, business and scientific discipline should each (now) go into a huddle and come up with the answer(s).

    Chuh man! Mek wi duh betta dan dat!

    - Waldemar Scott, waldemarscott @yahoo.com, Stockbridge, Georgia, Via Go-Jamaica

  • More Commentary



    Print this Page

    Letters to the Editor

    Most Popular Stories





    © Copyright 1997-2006 Gleaner Company Ltd.
    Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
    Home - Jamaica Gleaner