Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Arts &Leisure
Outlook
In Focus
Social
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

It's not rape. Blanket consent was given on taking vows
published: Sunday | July 30, 2006


Andrew Smith/Photography Editor

It is impossible for a man to rape his wife. To the best of my knowledge, rape means having sex with someone without their consent. In the case of a marriage, there is consent. It is universally accepted that sex between married couples is inevitable. So inevitable and intrinsic is it to marriage that a marriage can be annulled on the grounds that sex had not taken place.

It goes without saying, therefore, that blanket consent was given at the time of taking the marriage vows, and said consent cannot be just withdrawn on a whim and one's partner charged with rape. This whole issue, therefore, rests on the question of consent, and I have demonstrated that there is, in fact, consent. So the question is: How can somebody be charged for rape if his/her partner had given consent?

There are no known rules governing sex between husband and wife - only on weekends; only Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays; every third Thursday; only when I don't have a headache, only when I'm not mad at you, etc., etc. - which would then lead to a possible interpretation that sex outside of a given set of parameters is rape. No. The rules governing sex between married couples are totally optional for the couple.

Contending that a husband can rape his wife is like saying that if a man ignores his wife's basic needs and she takes money from his wallet (without his "consent") to buy food, she should go to prison - since this implies that a man has no intrinsic responsibility to support his wife.

WHERE A MARRIAGE HAS BROKEN DOWN

Even in a case where a marriage has broken down and there is some legal impediment to his contacting her (in which case we can assume that consent had been withdrawn), it could then be considered that a sexual crime was committed. However, while in this case it boils down to semantics, I would still have a problem with the word "rape" within ANY context of a marriage. If the man has to be charged, he should be charged with some kind of assault but given the same sentence as for a rape charge.

Keep marriage special! Keep sex as a natural act within a marriage. The laws of the land should recognise the sanctity of sex as an intrinsic part of a marriage and eschew the ridiculous concept of rape between consenting adults.

- Xavier Newton-Bryant

More Outlook



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2006 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner