Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Social
Caribbean
International
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

LETTER OF THE DAY - The Gleaner's 'jaundiced view of foreign policy'
published: Friday | August 18, 2006

The Editor, Sir:

Your editorial yesterday (Thursday, August 17) captioned 'JLP shifts stance on ties with Venezuela' reflects the most puerile logic to have visited your Opinion/Letters pages in a long time. Certainly, your editor must be capable of clearer and more analytical thinking.

The Opposition opposes Venezuela's membership of the United Nations Security Council on the very precise grounds that the hostile and bombastic crusade against the United States, which dominates its foreign policy, does not reflect the position of the Latin American and Caribbean region. As one of the region's two representatives on the Security Council, Venezuela would be expected to represent the views and interests not of itself but of the entire region. Mr. Chavez's frequent pronouncements do not suggest that Venezuela's stance on issues that will be deliberated on by the Security Council will conform to those parameters. We have not resiled or retreated from that position.

The fact that we oppose Venezuela's membership of the Security Council on the grounds stated above does not mean or require that we oppose a loan arrangement which is beneficial to Jamaica, provided there is no expressed or implied quid pro quo in relation to the Security Council seat. To equate our position on Venezuela's Security Council membership to an "apparent rejection of economic opportunities for Jamaica" is not only factually dishonest but suggests that your editor accepts the existence of a quid pro quo, that the "economic opportunities for Jamaica" are contingent on our support for Venezuela's membership on the Security Council.

Erroneous suggestions

It is also erroneous for your editor to suggest that the Opposition supported the candidacy of Guatemala. Indeed, both our Foreign Affairs Spokesman and myself on more than one occasion publicly expressed the view that a compromise candidate should be sought.

Your editor proffers the view that Jamaica is "sophisticated enough to manage a foreign policy that welcomes Venezuelan investments without undermining our friendship with the United States". He evidently does not believe that we are sophisticated enough to oppose Venezuela's membership of the Security Council without opposing Venezuela's investments in Jamaica.

I am, etc.,

BRUCE GOLDING

Leader of the Opposition

More Letters



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2006 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner