Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Let's Talk Life
Caribbean
International
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Hair wanted to quit for US$500,000
published: Saturday | August 26, 2006


Umpire Darrell Hair (left) speaks to England players (from left) Ian Bell and Paul Collingwood on the fourth day of the fourth test cricket match against Pakistan at The Oval cricket ground in London on August 20. - Reuters

LONDON, (Reuters):

Darrell Hair, the Australian umpire at the centre of the Pakistan ball-tampering controversy, offered to quit top-level cricket in return for $500,000, the International Cricket Council (ICC) said yesterday.

In a letter dated August 22, Hair requested "a one-off payment to compensate for the loss of future earnings and retainer payments over the next four years, which I believe would have been the best years I have to offer ICC and world umpiring."

The 53-year-old continued: "I am prepared to retire/stand down/relinquish my position on the élite (umpires) panel to take effect from August 31.

"This payment is to be the sum of $500,000 details of which must be kept confidential by both parties." He asked for the money to be paid into his account by August 31.

'Great stress'

ICC chief executive Malcolm Speed told a news conference that Hair was under "great stress" when he wrote the letter but that its contents would be discussed by its executive board next Saturday in Dubai.

"He's not sacked, not suspended and has not been charged but I didn't guarantee (to Hair) that each of those positions would be the case indefinitely. We are in very early stages," said Speed.

He continued: "We realise this makes Mr. Hair's situation very sensitive. We have made available to him security advice, counselling and media management to assist him."

The ball-tampering controversy had threatened the one-day series against England which begins next week but the ICC confirmed it will be held as scheduled.

Hair had been blamed by the Pakistan Cricket Board for sparking the row by ruling that the touring team had illegally tampered with the ball during the fourth and final Test with England at The Oval last Sunday.

That decision led to a forfeiture of the Test by Pakistan - the first team to do so in test history - and charges of bringing the game into disrepute and ball tampering against captain Inzamam-ul-Haq.

A disciplinary hearing against Inzamam, who faces an eight-match one-day international or four-Test ban if found guilty, will be held in the second half of September, the ICC said.

Opinions have been split throughout the cricketing world with leading Australian players, past and present, backing their countryman Hair against almost universal condemnation in the sub-continent.

Hair continued in the letter circulated to the media: "ICC may announce the retirement in anyway they wish but I would prefer a simple 'lifestyle choice' as this was the very reason I moved from Australia to settle in the U.K. three years ago."

After numerous correspondences with the ICC, Hair eventually revoked his offer in his final letter.

Match abandoned

Last Sunday, Pakistan had been incensed that the umpires decided they had been guilty of ball tampering, docking the team five runs, and decided to stay in the dressing room for several minutes as a protest.

Inzamam subsequently led his team back on the field but the umpires ruled that the match was already abandoned.

Referring to the Inzamam case, Speed said: "It involves two separate issues. Did the Pakistan team change the ball in an illegal manner? Secondly, when Pakistan refused to resume after the tea break, did that bring the game into disrepute?

"They are cricket issues. The ICC Code of Conduct provides a mechanism to dispense justice on cricket issues and that's the process we are trying to achieve here."

Hair has had a history of run-ins with Pakistan in the past and officials from the country's cricket board said Pakistan did not want the Australian to officiate any future matches involving them.

More Sport



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2006 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner