Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Farmer's Weekly
What's Cooking
UWI/Eye on Science
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Podcasts
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Coffee sector winning fight against coffee borer pest
published: Thursday | January 11, 2007

Gusland McCook, Contributor


Coffee berries nearing maturity on a farm in the Blue Mountains on Friday, August 25, 2006. - file

The Coffee Industry Board (CIB) is reporting success in the use of the Coffee Berry Borer (CBB) trap to reduce the presence of the pest on the island.

The CBB trap was first introduced in Jamaica in 2001 as a means of attracting the female coffee berry borers (Hypothenemus hampei) as they go in search of new fruits during the crop cycle.

Since that first introduction the CIB has imported approximately 50,000 of these traps. Most of them are already being used by farmers and most of these farmers have expressed satisfaction with the results, as they have seen the traps capture large numbers of this pest.

Over the past two years trials carried out by the CIB have provided some very positive information. The study, which evaluated two trap types: the original trap type (C) from 2001 and a local type made from two-litre drink bottles (type R), has shown a dramatic 70 per cent reduction in the number of CBB captured in the second year over the number captured in the first year.

This is a very significant achievement, given that when the pest population is high it is likely that there will be a high level of infestation. The resulting infestation at both sites in June, 2006 of 1.79 per cent at Plot A and 1.57 per cent at Plot B, stand testimony to this as the CBB population was much lower in 2006 than in 2005. It should be noted that for both years and at both study sites the management practices of the pest remained constant. That is to say, post harvest removal of residual fruits was done along with the application of endosulfan, which is the chemical recommended for managing this pest.

Lower infestation translates to lower bean damage and therefore fewer defects and hence higher bean quality. The result of this is more saleable coffee and more income for the industry.

Traps

The second observation was that the traps provided a clear indication of the most active times of the pest.

March and April were the busy months during the after-crop early flowering period, while July and August were the active months as the fruit developed . There was very little activity while the fruits were being harvested (September to December), with the exception of one study plot at one of the study sites. Here there was a significant increase in the number of the CBB captured during the month of December.

This information is very important to the coffee farmer. It tells us that field sanitation is very important in order to reduce the population level of the pest going into the new crop. The lower the pest population, the slower will be the rate of progression of the pest. Population management of the pest should therefore be a point of focus.

The third observation is that there is no great difference between the two types of traps in terms of the number of CBB captured.

Since two-litre drink bottles are easily accessible these could be very useful in helping to reduce the CBB population at a relatively low cost. Being able to determine the movement or behaviour of one's target object must be an advantage. It is therefore up to the industry stakeholders to make positive use of this advantage.

More Farmer's Weekly



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2007 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner