The Editor,Sir:

Over the last two years I have seen the management of Air Jamaica grapple with spiralling costs, losses and disgruntled workers. Interestingly the latest one involved their pilots who queried the idea of replacing the Airbus aircraft with older Boeing aircraft.

After much thought on the issue I think a compromise can be reached in terms of what is best for Air Jamaica's fleet and how to cut operational losses. Since Jamaicans are traditionally heavy travellers, the Boeing 757-200 would indeed be an excellent replacement (short-term) for the A321 as it operates well in high density areas and is suited for hot climates. Also, as demonstrated over the holidays, the baggage issue would be better addressed.

However, when it comes to the possibility of the Boeing 737-300, I side with the pilots and ask Air Jamaica to reconsider this option. Though popular, I fail to see why they should look at this aircraft instead of the A319 which has a greater range than the current A320s and also are more efficient and better suited for Air Jamaica's current state. Should passenger loads fall, the smaller A319 exposes the airline to less financial risk, thus saving money.

Routes in the Caribbean, Florida and Atlanta would become even more profitable based on the seating capacity and operational cost of this aircraft. The reality is, Air Jamaica is a small fish in a pond dominated by the larger fish, so why not go for what will work best for you?

I am, etc.,

COLLIN HUTCHINSON

canute2jm@yahoo.co.uk