Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Social
Countdown to ICC Cricket World Cup
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Appeal blocks extradition order
published: Friday | March 9, 2007

Montego Bay businessman, Hartford Montique, who has been in custody since October 2004, will not be extradited to the United States to face drug-related charges following a Court of Appeal ruling yesterday.

The court, in setting aside the extradition order, ruled that insufficient evidence was produced before the Resident Magistrate to link him to the offences. Montique had appealed against a Supreme Court ruling which turned down his application to be released from custody.

In October 2004, a Resident Magistrate ordered that Montique, who is also called 'Brookie', should be extradited to face charges of aiding and abetting, counselling or procuring the importation of marijuana into the United States.

He was also to face charges for possession of 100 kilograms of marijuana which was found in a mini-van in the United States in October 2003.

Attorneys-at-law Patrick Atkinson and Carolyn Reid-Cameron argued before the Court of Appeal that Montique should be released because the evidence before the Resident Magistrate did not establish a prima facie case against him.

No evidence

The Court of Appeal, comprising Justices Algernon Smith, Karl Harrison and Horace Marsh (acting), in ordering Montique's immediate release from custody, said that in his case, there was not a scintilla of evidence that he had any proprietary interest in the controlled substance which was seized in the U.S.

The court found that there was no evidence that he was involved in the importation or possession of the drugs. It was the court's finding that "the evidence adduced before the Resident Magistrate is insufficient to form a prima facie case against the appellant for the offences".

- B.G.

More News



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





Copyright 1997-2007 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner