Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Caribbean
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Live Radio
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Government of Jamaica, oil companies spar over Regulations law
published: Tuesday | June 19, 2007

Barbara Gayle, Staff Reporter

Legal arguments began yesterday in the motion brought by four major oil companies which are challenging Regulations stipulating the method by which fuel should be measured and the type of equipment which must be used.

The claimants, Texaco, Esso, Total and Cool Petroleum, are asking the Full Court to find that the Minister of Industry, Technology, Energy and Commerce exceeded his authority when he passed the Regulations in 2004.

Minister has no authority

The Regulations were passed following complaints by some members of the Jamaica Gasolene Retailers Association that they were suffering losses due to shrinkage caused by temperature changes from the point of delivery to the point when gasolene was received for storage.

The Regulations were passed under the Weight and Measures Act of 1976.

Attorney-at-law Georgia Gibson Henlin, instructed by the firm Nunes Scholefield DeLeon and Co., argued yesterday that the minister had no authority to stipulate the method by which petroleum was measured or the equipment used to do so. She said his only authority was to stipulate units of measurement and standards of measurement.

Technical difficulties

The companies are claiming that the Regulations will impose technical and administrative difficulties on them, and they were not consulted before the Regulations were passed. It is also their contention that compliance with the Regulations will increase cost to them and also increase overall costs to consumers.

They claim further that the Regulations were intended to benefit the retailers. They claim also that there was no mechanism whereby the benefits being passed to retailers will be passed on to the consumers.

Senior Puisne Judge Marva McIntosh, Justice Horace Marsh and Justice Roy Anderson are hearing the motion.

More Business



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2007 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner