Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Profiles in Medicine
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

BE WELL - Spare the rod, you won't spoil the child
published: Wednesday | July 25, 2007


Eulalee Thompson

This article will make some people angry or, at the very least, very uncomfortable. It's just been so amazing listening to talk radio over the past week or so, to some adults express their views on this revived, anachronistic national debate on corporal punishment. I wondered if dinosaurs had been unearthed to haunt us all over again.

In a way, this revived, antiquated discussion shouldn't be astonishing. In the 'collective unconscious' of this community (perhaps rooted in a violent British colonial slave past and an overpowering Christian dogma) is the view that children leave their mothers' womb as wicked and bad creatures. These terrible beasts, who by the way are seen as the 'property' of their parents, must have this wickedness beaten out of them; they must be beaten into obedience; remember the Bible says, 'spare the rod and spoil the child'.

Wooden hairbrush

And, just to show you how this kind of thinking has been internalised and persists in the society, I overheard one of these dinosaurs relating (in such a graphic way that I cringed) how she was beaten as a child on the buttocks with the flat, wooden part of a hairbrush. After this thrashing, her buttocks hurt and burned so much that she could not sit for at least 15 minutes.

But she told the radio audience that she was grateful to her parents for doing this because she was stubborn and that she is no worse off. No worse off than that what, I wondered. And, if these past beatings were no big deal then how come so many of these adults can remember and recount all of them in such great detail?

My brain can't distinguish shades of beating. Beating is beating. It doesn't matter much (at least to me) who is doing the beating and who is on the receiving end. If a man beats on his wife (or vice versa) or if any adult beats on another adult, it's appalling and a criminal offence. Then how come an adult (parent or teacher) beating on a child is labelled as corporal punishment and deemed more socially acceptable? Come on now, does that make any sense?

More Profiles in Medicine



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2007 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner