The Editor, Sir:I have long been in support of expenditure to construct a new Parliament building in which our legislators can meet. Anyone who is against this expenditure clearly is short-sighted and has no pride in where the leaders of our nation meet. No matter what we may say and think about them and their 'faults', no country should be proud to have Gordon House as the place where matters of great importance as the place where our legislators meet. No disrespect intended, but it has outlived its purpose.
My suggestion for years has been on the waterfront on that parcel of land across from the Bank of Jamaica. I see Mr. Conrad Jackson shares my view.
Demolish dilapidated buildings
If it is to remain on Duke street, I suggest Duke Street and Mark Lane behind the House be closed, from the current site, up to the intersection of North Street, and all the dilapidated buildings surrounding the structure be demolished. The JMA building, as well as the Printing Office, would have to be relocated.
However, the waterfront is a better site as the land space is there and the House should rest in the heart of the capital city. This time, make sure the building is not just adequate but forward-thinking, so that space will be available to accommodate our leaders for the next 50 or more years. Parking must be in a multi-storey format, connected to the main buildings (similar to that of the Conference Centre/Seabed Building) to utilise space.
Forward-thinking facilities
Adequate library, storage, meeting facilities and office space for at least 70 parliamentarians and 25 senators (forward-thinking as we may need to expand the number of members of both houses in years to come) should be built.
I am not an architect, but make the building as attractive as the BO with a wide piazza at the main entrance.
Meanwhile, Gordon House should be refurbished and handed back to the KSAC for meetings, as my history taught me that this building was originally built for use by that body.
I am, etc.,
KARL HAMILTON
ksaintch@yahoo.com
