Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Social
Caribbean
The Star
E-Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

Vote counting in Hanover
published: Friday | October 12, 2007

The Editor, Sir:

You published a letter from Mr. Michael Dunn in The Gleaner of Thursday, October 11, regarding the situation in Eastern Hanover with the non-counting of some ballots and the subsequent court action by the JLP.

Based on the position arrived at by Mr. Dunn, I am forced to conclude that his views must have been formed out of ignorance to the facts surrounding the issue, ignorance of what the Representation of the Peoples Act of Jamaica says, regarding the accepting or rejection of ballots or out of overcommitment to a party position.

In simple terms, the law states that a voter's vote should not be discarded due to any failure or action on the part of any electoral worker. In other words, after I make my X, the requirement is that I should fold my ballot and give it to the presiding office who should sign the counterfoil, tear it along the perforated line and place the ballot in the box.

Cannot reject ballot

In this instance, the presiding officer failed to properly tear off the counterfoil along the perforation and instead tore in such a manner that his signature which should remain on the actual ballot ended up coming off on the counterfoil. Based on law and common sense, subject to there being no other basis on which any ballot so torn could be rejected, you cannot reject this voter's ballot, he or she having made his intention clear as to who he wanted to be his representative. This is the basis on which attorney-at-law, Abe Dabdoub, Dr. D.K. Duncan and the PNP are seeking to disfranchise legitimate electors of Eastern Hanover.

The fact is that this is something that happens in every election and such votes have always been quite rightly counted. How could you have a situation where it is left in the hands of the presiding officer to decide whose votes are counted, whether through his deliberate actions or an error on his part?

Mr. Dunn should also understand that the legal process allows for the decision of a judge to be reviewed at a higher level and this is quite in order as all decisions by any judge should be able to stand up to scrutiny.

I am, etc.,

JEROME HENRY

jeromenh@yahoo.com

14 2nd Avenue

Buff Bay

Portland

More Letters



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2007 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner