The Editor, Sir:

In recent times, a number of our leading deejays/recording artistes have appeared on television and radio programmes in an attempt to clarify their stand on the crime-influenced lyrics used in their songs. These songs preach violence against mankind, profane human interaction, and crude sex activities which most Jamaicans say have major negative influence on our youngsters and some adults who have been wreaking havoc in our nation.

In defending themselves, the artistes say that they sing about life's reality and are merely a voice for our country folks. They argue that in no way should they (song artistes) be held responsible for unacceptable behaviour and unlawful acts that are carried out by fellow Jamaicans.

Paraphrasing songs

Recording artistes and song producers give no leverage for media music presenters to culture positive vibes when providing tainted-lyric versions only of songs for promotion and endorsements. If polite words replaced abrasive or crude language in a remodelled edition of vulgar-lyric songs, the lyricists and recording artistes are likely to contemplate thoughts of their songs being watered-down and suffering reduced profitability, as well as misinterpretation of paraphrasing songs. Paraphrasing songs could hide the real issue that some songs are meant to highlight, and may insulate ambiguity; but not so, as the original soundtrack would not lose its impact and popularity with the general public, thus ensuring that the recording artiste maintains commercial value.

Producing dual sound tracks for NFFAP (not fit for airplay) songs would minimise song-influenced potential of social unrest among fellow countrymen. Radio-friendly versions of rebel songs may convince some people that these songs are not chants of instructions, plus, the artiste's income would increase from the unit sales.

I am, etc.,

C. G. JOHNSON

johnson7c@hotmail.com

Kingston