Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Let's Talk Life
Healthy Lifestyle
More News
The Star
Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News

More food for thought
published: Saturday | April 5, 2008

Dr Dunstan Campbell, the Food and Agriculture Organisation's representative in Jamaica, The Bahamas and Belize, gave us something to chew over in yesterday's Gleaner.

As far as words of wisdom on increased food production go, Dr Campbell's advice was at best a reheat as we have heard them before, but as these matters tend to go, impact depends not only on the importance of what is being said, but also the importance of who says it.

So while calls for increased food production to offset the rising food prices are nothing new, it is very significant that Dr Campbell said, "We cannot just give up. Produce more in the livestock sector and in the root- crop sector, such as yams, Irish and sweet potatoes."

It was also noted in the article that the 1996 Agricultural Census of Jamaica stated that only some 273,000 hectares of the 449,493 hectares of farmland in Jamaica were being utilised, although by casual observation it would appear that an even higher proportion of potentially high-yield acreage is lying idle. In addition, some has been turned over to housing, notably in the areas of St Catherine along Highway 2000.

The urging to produce more food is, of course, practical and admirable. However, before we return to our agricultural roots, it is imperative that we examine the routes by which we have become so disenchanted with food production in the first place. And we will not even attempt to assess the psychological impact of slavery and the mental distancing from the plantation, although the ex-slaves who did manage to get away engaged in small-scale farming on marginal, hilly land.

There is the matter of the large-scale urbanisation of Jamaica, one of the ludicrous consequences being the number of persons crammed into inner-city communities who have roots in rural farming communities where there is space to grow in more ways than one. Then, there is the way in which farming is seen as a pursuit for old men in waterboots and banana-stained khakis, sporting a cutlass in a crocus bag and grubby fingernails; this despite the existence of huge food production concerns such as Jamaica Broilers and Tru-Juice, whose more technological approach can be imitated in parts on a much smaller scale.

Added to this is the unfortunate tendency to see imported goods and services - including food - as inherently superior to those originating in Jamaica, as well as the perennial class concerns, which condemn as menial labour putting hands into the soil to do other than light gardening.

Of course, these attitudes are not universal, but are widespread enough to make us extremely vulnerable to rising food prices worldwide.

So getting a high proportion of Jamaicans to grow food in the first place and then actually consume what is produced here is going to take a massive mental repositioning of agricultural production as well as self-perception. In light of the potential savings in expenditure on food, an investment in a media campaign as well as on the ground to position agriculture on a medium to small scale, as well as kitchen gardening, as desirable and respectable would not be wasted.

In addition, too, more effort would have to be made to restrict praedial larceny. After all, the benefits of tilling the soil must accrue to those who actually sow, not those who only reap.

The opinions on this page, except for the above, do not necessarily reflect the views of The Gleaner. To respond to a Gleaner editorial, email us: editor@gleanerjm.com or fax: 922-6223. Responses should be no longer than 400 words. Not all responses will be published.

More Commentary



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories






© Copyright 1997-2008 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner