Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Flair
More News
The Star
Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice (UK)
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
Weekly Poll
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News



Creating unnecessary panic
published: Monday | September 15, 2008

The Editor, Sir:

I have been following the debate on abortion ever since an advisory group appointed by the Ministry of Health reported the problems women were facing in the public health system because of unsafe or botched abortions.

It is a very controversial issue and I commend the Govern-ment's courage to take this on despite the unnecessary furore that some church voices have created.

I saw in The Gleaner of Tuesday, September 9, a note from Dr Doreen Brady West claiming that the proposed bill contains fines or penalties for doctors and midwives who act on conscientious objection.

Research

I did some research and what I found in the proposed bill, in Section 5 dealing with penalties, stated: "Where any midwife or medical practitioner or other health-service provider who objects to termination of pregnancy on the grounds of conscience, refuses or deliberately fails to inform any woman seeking an abortion of a practitioner who provides the service, under sections 4 and 15 he/she shall be liable on summary conviction, to a fine of up to two hundred and fifty thousand dollars and/or imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months."

Simply put, the right to conscientious objection is recognised. Any doctor or midwife may refuse to provide the service for religious or other reasons. However, the proposed bill acknowledges that the patient is at the centre of the debate and, therefore, the midwife or medical practitioner is obliged to refer the patient to another doctor who may provide the service.

Public health ethics

The penalty is to midwives and medical practitioners who refuse to provide the woman with information or referrals. This request is normal in the public health ethics, not just for reproductive health. Any doctor who refuses a patient is supposed to give alternative information and refer that patient to another doctor.

Dr Doreen Brady West is creating unnecessary panic simply because she does not respect the fact that some women have a mind of their own and make their own choices based on their own life circumstances.

I am, etc.,

REBEKAH LAWRENCE

navelstring@gmail.com

More Letters



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories






© Copyright 1997-2008 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner