Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Lifestyle
Let's Talk Life
Feature
More News
The Star
Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice (UK)
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
1998 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
WebCam
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News



issue: How come, Minister Mullings?
published: Saturday | September 20, 2008

The Honourable Clive Mullings got it wrong when he revealed (in the manner and form) to Parliament and, by extension, the country that the JPS owes the Government $5.7 billion, $2.9 billion of which is now due. Far from coming to the defence of the JPS, I am merely opining that Minister Mullings needs to remember that just over a year ago the JLP formed the GOVERNMENT (emphasis supplied). This sort of sensational and dramatic revelation in the House is more consonant with the role of Her Majesty's loyal Opposition. Furthermore, it made it patently clear that he was being reactive, as opposed to proactive, in his supervisory role.

It is my considered opinion that the minister was prompted to make the announcement because of his own weaknesses in managing the JPS imbroglio. For weeks, customers of the JPS have been asking, "How Come?", and, Minister Mullings, to our knowledge, did not initiate any action to investigate the legitimacy of customers' grouse or the stance of the JPS management despite the fact that the Government of Jamaica is a 25 per cent shareholder in the company. It was only after Prime Minister Bruce Golding intervened and ordered a probe did Mr Mullings become vocal.

I find this rather surprising since the minister's portfolio responsibilities were reduced to one earlier this year. In other words, the energy portfolio should be his only concern at this time. In fairness to the minister, he may have been 'working behind the scenes, but this clearly was not yielding any results and besides, the minister is no political neophyte, the public must be made aware of progress (or rather lack of it).

I urge the minister to adopt a proactive and purposeful approach to his assigned ministerial responsibilities and be less reactionary and alarmist.

- Maximus C. McPherson, maximus.mcpherson@gmail.com, Faculty of Law,UWI, Via Go-Jamaica

More Commentary



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories






© Copyright 1997-2008 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner