Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
Social
More News
Power 106 News
The Star
Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice (UK)
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
2005 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Event Guide
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
Video
WebCam
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News



Reacting to violence
published: Friday | November 21, 2008

THE EDITOR, Sir:

MY DESIRE to become little more rational and a little less emotional about capital punishment led me to do research. Among other things, this is what I found:

There are some indicators that it acts as an anti-deterrent, that is, the death penalty actually increases the homicide rate in the United States: In 1996, those states which had the death penalty had an average murder rate of 7.1 per 100,000 population; those states which do not execute people had a homicide rate of 3.6.

Comparing adjacent states where one state has the death penalty and the other does not, frequently shows that the states with capital punishment have a much higher homicide rate.

A report of the Bureau of Justice Statistics showed that during 1996, southern states, where about 81 per cent of the executions are performed, have an average murder rate of nine per 100,000 population. States in the northeast are responsible for one per cent of the executions and have a murder rate of 5.4.

Proof from studies

A 1980 study of homicides in New York found that the average number of murders increased in the month following an execution.

A 1995 study of the annual percentage increases in homicide rates in California showed that murders increased 10 per cent a year during 1952 to 1967 when the state was executing people. When the state performed no executions (1968-1991), the average rate of increase was less (4.8 per cent).

Canada's homicide rate has dropped 27 per cent since the death penalty was abolished in that country (for ordinary crimes) in 1976. For many years prior to 1976, the federal government had converted each death sentence to life imprisonment.

The FBI Uniform Crime Reports Division publication Crime in the US for 1995 reports that there were 4.9 murders per 100,000 people in states that have abolished the death penalty, compared with 9.2 murders in those states which still have the death penalty. "In no state has the number of murders diminished after legalising the death penalty."

And I ask are we, in fact, a drowning society clutching desperately after a straw, or is it a noose? And what will we resort to when we come to realise that state killings - like violent movies and music - actually send the message that killing is an appropriate and acceptable way of resolving issues?

I am, etc.,

STANLEY REDWOOD

stanley_redwood@yahoo.com

Middle Quarters

St Elizabeth

Via Go-Jamaica




More Letters



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2008 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner