Bookmark Jamaica-Gleaner.com
Go-Jamaica Gleaner Classifieds Discover Jamaica Youth Link Jamaica
Business Directory Go Shopping inns of jamaica Local Communities

Home
Lead Stories
News
Business
Sport
Commentary
Letters
Entertainment
International
More News
Power 106 News
The Star
Financial Gleaner
Overseas News
The Voice (UK)
Communities
Hospitality Jamaica
Google
Web
Jamaica- gleaner.com

Archives
2005 - Now (HTML)
1834 - Now (PDF)
Services
Find a Jamaican
Careers
Library
Power 106FM
Weather
Subscriptions
News by E-mail
Newsletter
Print Subscriptions
Interactive
Chat
Dating & Love
Event Guide
Free Email
Guestbook
ScreenSavers
Submit a Letter
Video
WebCam
About Us
Advertising
Gleaner Company
Contact Us
Other News
Stabroek News



STAGGERING! - Professor predicts 100m record could drop to 9.48, 200m to 18.63
published: Tuesday | December 2, 2008


Jamaica's Usain Bolt celebrates as he wins the men's 200-metre final with a world-record time of 19.30 at the Beijing Olympics in China. - AP

LONDON (AP):

Usain Bolt's stunning world record in the Olympic 100-metre final is still a long way from how fast the human body can go, according to a study by a US professor.

Shortly after Bolt ran 9.69 seconds in Beijing, Stanford University biology Professor Mark Denny set about to estimate just how fast humans will be able to run. He concluded that male sprinters could eventually get the 100 record down to 9.48 seconds and women could run the distance in 10.39.

"My results ... tell us that speed has limits, but not what accounts for these limits," writes Denny, whose conclusions were published last week in the Journal of Experimental Biology.

Bolt surely could have gone faster at the Olympics in August. The tall Jamaican slowed down over the final metres and even banged his fist off his chest in celebration before crossing the line three-hundredths of a second faster than the record he had set a few months earlier.

In September, Norwegian physicist Hans Eriksen analysed TV footage of the Olympic final and estimated that Bolt could have run 9.55 seconds if he had not slowed down.

The women's record in the 100 is 10.49, set by the late Florence Griffith-Joyner in 1988. But Denny used 10.61 seconds in his study because of "compelling evidence that the (10.49) race was wind aided".

Denny used historical records dating back to the 19th century to track the progress of speed in humans, horses and dogs. He found that speeds in horses and dogs at the major races in the United States and Britain peaked, mostly in the 1970s but some earlier, while most of the human races had not.

"In each case, an absolute speed limit is definable and the current record approaches that predicted maximum," the 57-year-old Denny says in his summary.

But while Denny, like other experts in the past, concludes that speed has limits, he says it is impossible to know what those limitations are. He writes that it is unlikely that athletes' speeds are constrained by a single physiological or mechanical factor.

Denny, an avid marathoner, says the pattern of these limitations on speed could help scientists figure out how to break them.

At the Olympics, Bolt followed up his record in the 100 with another in the 200, running 19.30. Denny predicts that record could be lowered to a staggering 18.63.

In the marathon, where Haile Gebrselassie holds the men's record of 2:03:59, Denny's study says that time can be lowered by more than three minutes to 2:00:47.

Women's record

According to the research, the women's record of 2:15:25 set by Paula Radcliffe could be trimmed to 2:14:97.

"Predicted maximum speeds for women are 9.3 per cent to 13.4 per cent slower than those for men," Denny writes. "The present gender gap between men and women will never be closed between 100 metres and the marathon."

Denny also mentions performance-enhancing drugs and their ability to make a human, or animal, go faster.

"For present purposes, let us define a greyhound, thoroughbred or human (male or female) as an individual performing without drug or genetic enhancement," Denny writes. "If drugs have contributed to the winning speeds in the races used here, speeds in the absence of these drugs would presumably have been slower."


More Sport



Print this Page

Letters to the Editor

Most Popular Stories





© Copyright 1997-2008 Gleaner Company Ltd.
Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Letters to the Editor | Suggestions | Add our RSS feed
Home - Jamaica Gleaner